Same-sex unions test limits of love
July 2nd, 2008 by MichelePublished June 28, 2008 in the Antelope Valley Press
by David Hoffman
In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in favor of gay marriage, the Antelope Valley Press has devoted several articles in the Opinion and Religion sections to the topic. I read with interest the lead editorial in the Sunday, June 22, AV Press on the drama surrounding gay unions.
The Jewish tradition, which emphasizes the blessing that is derived from children and idealizes harmonious and loving family life, really does not have much to say about homosexuality.
There is no prohibition of lesbianism, for example, though Leviticus 18 includes male homosexual in a series of prohibited sexual acts, calling it an “abomination.” But what is an “abomination”?
The Hebrew word everyone translates as “abomination,” does not mean that God finds the behavior inherently repugnant, but rather the behavior is one for a man to avoid.
In a related prohibition (Deuteronomy 22:5) concerning cross dressing, (wearing the apparel of the opposite sex), which arises innocently in many young children and persists at times into adulthood as transvestitism, the two greatest Medieval rabbis, Maimonides and Rashi, interpret the Hebrew word often translated as “abomination” homiletically as toeh – vah, meaning that more mistakes will come in the wake of that act. In other words, cross dressing in and of itself is not inherently repulsive.
In the Barbara Streisand movie, “Yentl,” the girl pretending to be a boy because she wants to study Torah in the Yeshivah will be abhorred, if discovered, for the potentially inappropriate seduction she presumably dressed herself up for to initiate, not because it is inherently abominable to the Divine sensibility.
And in the medieval Islamic prayer assembly, in addition to men and women sitting separately, there was another separate section for the cross dressers.
This clearly indicates that when effeminacy in males presented itself, much of the monotheistic world handled it with tolerance, sensitivity and matter-of-factness, and for very good reason: The most important point of rabbinic, Islamic and Christian ethics is to not humiliate a fellow being!
Of course, the kind of personal modesty and humility practiced in ages gone by are quite scarce in our soap box-loving, sexually shameless civilization.
I don’t support the campaign of my friends in the Christian clergy to make gay marriage a political issue by advocating for an amendment to our state constitution.
Why? Because what is truly abominable is that this private and personal matter has become a cause célèbre in the first place.
What we need to do is to restore this issue to its proper proportions.
And even though the right wing has good reason to abhor the glut of entitlements that have improperly spilled over into the homosexuality debate, making homosexuals into bigger victims than they actually have been in any number of civilizations, this is not the arena in which to fight that battle.
On the contrary, making this into a major front of the war of values shows the religious right as having its own entitlement hubris, and thus only adding fuel to the entitlement fire they themselves should want to extinguish.
Since the Massachusetts law permitting homosexual nuptials went into effect in 2004, there have only been 60,000 gay weddings — 30,000 in the first half year the law was in effect.
This truly demonstrates just how much of a storm in a tea cup this whole issue is.
Unlike the Abortion issue, which is purely a matter of faith, gay marriage is an issue where demonstrable consequences surely have a bearing.
Let the law in our republic of California take its course, and let us see what happens to these homosexual marriages. Perhaps those who will now be married can give new meaning to the sanctity of love through the generosity and compassion to others they will show.
Let there be a competition over the demonstrable quality of our loving. Let it not be over the letter of the law, but the spirit.
David Hoffman, chairman of the Antelope Valley Interfaith Forum and immediate past chairman of the Cape Town (South Africa) Interfaith Forum, serves as rabbi at Lancaster’s Temple Beth Knesset Bamidbar.
